Missing Health data for Eaton 9PX UPS vs Eaton 9130 UPS

Help
1

Wasn’t sure if I should add this here or in the Device section but since the UPS is properly detected by OS I thought I would start here.

I have a large fleet of Eaton 9130 UPS’s that have the following “state” health sensors.

all
all922×710 19.8 KB

I have a a couple newer Eaton 9PX UPS’s that have fewer health sensors. This is causing the UPS health to be reported as good when in fact it isn’t. In this case I have a 9PX indicating that it’s battery check failed but due to the missing health sensors librenms is not able to alert me.

missing
missing914×645 16.7 KB

Here are the active alerts on the UPS itself.

alerts
alerts738×138 9.32 KB

Both models are using SNMPv1 and my librenms deployment is on the current branch updates.

I’m at a loss on how to resolve the missing sensors

2

If you are having troubles with discovery/polling include the pastebin output of:

./discovery.php -h HOSTNAME -d | ./pbin.sh
./poller.php -h HOSTNAME -r -f -d | ./pbin.sh
3

For the Eaton 9PX

Discovery
https://p.libren.ms/view/fd4af90f

Poller
https://p.libren.ms/view/1477251c

4

So that sensor you are seeing is because this os has rfc1628 compatibility enabled which means it’s using some generic sensors. I’m guessing this model doesn’t actually support them.

We’d need a full snmpbulkwalk to see what’s available to us: snmpwalk -OUneb -v1 -c COMMUNITY HOSTNAME .

5

Here is the pastebin for the snmpwalk.

https://p.libren.ms/view/44093c69